Prediction markets have experienced rapid growth recently, capturing the interest of investors, cryptocurrency enthusiasts, and high-net-worth individuals seeking unique ways to engage with the financial markets. Platforms like Kalshi have introduced a different approach to trading, enabling participants to buy and sell contracts based on the likelihood of future events.
While public interest often centers on how these innovative markets operate, an equally critical issue is starting to surface: the tax implications of your trades.
A recent legislative move in North Carolina indicates that state governments are actively developing tax frameworks specifically for prediction markets. Although this new law targets operators rather than individual traders, it signals a broader shift. Federal and state regulators increasingly view prediction markets as a permanent fixture of the financial ecosystem, meaning tax rules, compliance guidelines, and reporting requirements will continue to evolve. If you are actively trading prediction contracts, now is the time to pay close attention.
In a prediction market, participants trade contracts tied directly to the outcome of future events. Rather than purchasing corporate stock or mutual funds, traders buy contracts that gain or lose value based on whether a specific event occurs.
These contracts typically cover questions such as:
While these platforms may initially resemble sports wagering, a crucial legal distinction exists. Many of these markets operate under the regulatory oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency charged with overseeing U.S. derivatives markets. Rather than classifying these activities as gambling, the CFTC regulates specific event contracts as financial products—a distinction that carries significant weight for regulators and taxpayers alike.
North Carolina recently passed legislation enacting a 6% tax on the net trading fee revenue earned by prediction-market operators within the state, alongside an increase in the state's sports wagering tax.
The real significance of this law extends far beyond the tax itself. By implementing this legislation, North Carolina chose to recognize federally regulated prediction-market platforms as separate entities from traditional sports gambling. Rather than grouping these markets under gambling rules, the state acknowledged the CFTC's federal regulatory framework.
For individual investors, this law does not impose a new state tax on daily trading activities. However, it demonstrates that lawmakers are beginning to structure tax systems around prediction markets as a distinct asset class. Once governments establish industry-specific tax guidelines, further regulations generally follow.

At the federal level, regulatory boundaries are also becoming clearer. The CFTC has consistently asserted that federally regulated event-contract markets fall under its oversight rather than state gambling laws, defending this stance in litigation over state-level regulatory attempts.
While these legal battles primarily affect the exchange operators, they underscore that prediction markets are becoming deeply integrated into the U.S. financial system. As this recognition solidifies, taxpayers should expect additional federal tax guidance and formal reporting requirements to follow.
One of the main challenges for traders is that the IRS has not yet released comprehensive guidance specifically addressing prediction market transactions. Consequently, tax professionals must evaluate several potential pathways based on existing tax laws.
First, transactions could be treated as gambling income. Under this approach, net winnings are taxed as ordinary income at your marginal rate. Meanwhile, gambling losses are generally only deductible if you itemize, and current tax rules limit the deduction for gambling losses to 90% of those losses. In some cases, this limitation could result in a tax liability even if you broke even financially over the course of the tax year.
Second, prediction market contracts could be classified as capital assets. Under capital asset treatment, gains and losses are reported similarly to other property transactions using Form 8949. Net capital losses can offset capital gains, and up to $3,000 can be used to offset ordinary income annually.
Third, certain contracts traded on CFTC-designated contract markets might qualify for treatment under Section 1256 of the Internal Revenue Code. Depending on the nature of the contract and specific rules, some transactions could potentially benefit from the favorable 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gains tax split, regardless of how long the contract was held.
Because the IRS has not provided definitive rules, there is no single standard that applies to all prediction market transactions.
Without clear IRS directives, many tax advisors recommend taking a conservative reporting position. Treating your prediction market winnings as ordinary income is generally the most audit-resistant approach because it applies the least favorable tax treatment. While this might mean paying more tax upfront than future rules might require, it greatly reduces the risk of the IRS claiming your income was underreported.
A conservative approach also minimizes the risk of accuracy-related penalties if the IRS eventually implements stricter rules. Furthermore, if the IRS later issues formal guidance that permits more favorable treatment, you can generally file an amended return to claim a refund. Taxpayers typically have three years from the date the original return was filed, or two years from the date the tax was paid—whichever is later—to make this change. For many, paying a bit more today is better than facing back taxes, interest, and penalties later.
Whenever a new financial asset gains popularity, tax complexities are never far behind. If you are active in these markets, you should consider several critical questions:
These are planning questions that need to be addressed before filing season, rather than when you are filling out your tax organizer.

Investors who navigated the early days of cryptocurrency will recognize this regulatory pattern. In the beginning, crypto tax reporting guidelines were minimal, and many assumed the IRS would not focus on digital assets. Over time, however, the IRS intensified enforcement, expanded disclosure requirements, revised tax forms, and established strict reporting standards.
While prediction markets are distinct from cryptocurrency and may not be regulated in the exact same manner, both represent rapid financial innovations that outpaced the tax code. As prediction markets mature, we can expect the IRS to introduce more targeted guidance, expanded information reporting, and new state-level guidelines.
No matter how the regulations shift, maintaining thorough records is your best line of defense. If you actively trade prediction contracts, you should keep diligent records of:
Keeping organized, accurate records throughout the year makes tax preparation simple and enables us to help optimize your tax position while identifying potential planning strategies.
North Carolina is likely just the first of many states to establish rules for prediction markets. As these platforms grow, more states will review how to tax operators within their borders and how these transactions fit into existing state tax codes. Some may replicate North Carolina's approach of taxing operator fees, others may implement more aggressive regulations, and some may wait for federal clarity. Regardless, the trend points toward prediction markets becoming a standard part of the broader financial system.
Too often, investors wait until after the tax year ends to think about their liability, which often means missing out on key planning opportunities. If you trade prediction contracts, how you choose to report your gains and losses is a major decision. In the absence of direct IRS guidance, selecting a reasonable, documented reporting position is essential.
Analyzing your trading activity before filing your tax return allows us to identify potential reporting roadblocks, evaluate the best tax positions under current law, and prepare you for future regulatory changes. It also aligns perfectly with keeping your books accurate and your taxes optimized—ensuring your overall financial foundation remains solid and reliable.
Prediction markets are successfully transitioning from a niche asset class into a recognized, regulated segment of the financial landscape. North Carolina's legislation highlights a growing state-level focus on establishing clear frameworks for this sector, while the CFTC's involvement confirms its status as a financial product. Until the IRS provides definitive guidance, investors must proceed with careful, proactive planning.
If you are actively trading prediction contracts, let us help you review your activity now to stay ahead of changing federal and state tax requirements.
Sign up for our newsletter.