Can You Truly Claim Your Dog as a Tax Dependent?
Have you ever stared at your annual spending on vet bills, grooming, and specialty food for your pet and thought, “My pet really is a member of my household,” you’re not isolated in this thought. Indeed, one attorney has taken that sentiment to federal court.
In December 2025, New York attorney Amanda Reynolds initiated a lawsuit against the IRS, seeking recognition of her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, as a legal dependent for federal tax purposes.
While the case might sound whimsical, it raises a significant issue that resonates with many taxpayers: Are pet expenses deductible? If not, why?
Let’s delve into the intricacies of this case, the current tax laws, and the limited scenarios where animal-related tax benefits do apply.
The Legal Argument: “My Dog Meets Dependency Requirements”
In Reynolds' legal filing, she contends that Finnegan satisfies the IRS's dependency criteria:
He resides with her full-time,
He lacks income, and
She covers over half of his support, including expenses surpassing $5,000 annually for necessities like food, medical care, and daycare.
A national news report describes Reynolds' assertion, “For all intents and purposes, Finnegan is like a daughter, and is definitely a ‘dependent,’” from the complaint.
Reynolds further argues that current policies unjustly discriminate based on “species” (an Equal Protection issue) and equates the absence of tax acknowledgment to an inappropriate “taking” under the Fifth Amendment.
Current Status of the Case
The lawsuit is active in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, though it is on hold for the moment.
A federal magistrate judge approved a motion to pause discovery (halting the evidence-exchange phase) as the IRS readies its motion to dismiss.
In the court’s written order, the judge labels the lawsuit as raising a “novel but urgent question” regarding whether household pets should qualify as “dependents” under the tax code. Nonetheless, the order indicates challenging hurdles ahead, noting that the government has shown the claims seem “unmeritorious on their face” and unlikely to withstand a motion to dismiss.
In summary: the lawsuit exists, it garners attention, yet the court remains skeptical of its prospects.
Why Pets Aren’t Dependents Under Federal Tax Law
The primary issue with the lawsuit: tax law defines dependents as “individuals.”
Under Internal Revenue Code Section 152, a dependent must be a “qualifying child” or “qualifying relative,” but the statute's repetitive use of “individual” historically implies a human.
That's why IRS forms and regulations don’t even contemplate designating a pet as a dependent. Dependents must have Social Security numbers or other taxpayer IDs, and the related benefits – both credits and deductions – are crafted around human family and household dynamics.
So while Reynolds claims Finnegan qualifies under a functional dependency test (no income, cohabitation, support), current tax codes aren’t shaped to view animals as dependent “individuals.”
Existing Tax Benefits for Animals
Even if routine pet expenses are generally non-deductible, certain noteworthy exceptions exist. These insights provide valuable tax guidance.
1) Deducting Service Animal Costs as Medical Expenses
Should an animal serve as a trained service companion for a disability, applicable costs may qualify as medical expenses if you itemize deductions.
The IRS clarifies that medical expenses might be deductible if they surpass the relevant AGI threshold. Costs tied to obtaining, training, and maintaining a service animal count as medical expenses when directly linked to medical care.
Note: Emotional support animals usually don’t qualify under federal laws; service animals are specifically trained for disability-associated tasks.
2) Business Use of Animals
In some business scenarios, animals fulfill a business role—examples include:
Guard dogs maintaining business premises, or
Animals aiding in pest control.
In these instances, certain ongoing costs may be necessary business expenses. (Documentation and legitimate business rationale remain crucial.)
Your source document also pinpoints this as a rare category where the IRS sanctions animal-related tax benefits.
3) Charitable Deductions for Foster Animals
Taxpayers who foster animals for eligible charities might qualify to deduct certain uncompensated expenses as charitable donations—within strict guidelines and documentation.
Tax Considerations for Pet Owners
This lawsuit resonates because pets are beloved family members for millions of Americans, incurring genuine costs. However, tax law is structured around statutory delineations, not sentiments.
Currently:
Pets are not eligible dependents on federal tax returns.
General pet expenses (food, grooming, typical vet care) are typically personal and not deductible.
Certain animal expenses may qualify for deductions—service animals, business-related animals, and occasionally foster-associated charitable costs.
As for Reynolds' suit, it warrants observation—not for an expectation of IRS recognition of pet dependents, but to highlight how deeply pets are woven into the fabric of family life financially and emotionally, amidst a tax system that demarcates “family” sharply from “property.”
And, if nothing else, it serves as a pivotal reminder: before assuming something is deductible, verify IRS acknowledgments.
Want tax & accounting tips and insights?
Sign up for our newsletter.